More nonsense from David Quinn in today's Indo. My letter of reply below.
A Chara,
David Quinn (Comment, August 31st) has once again demonstrated his ignorance of the beauty of science and the material. In seeking to reconcile Mother Teresa's quite understandable doubts with his supernatural beliefs, he decries atheists like Richard Dawkins who - shock horror - "thinks that even love is simply a chemical reaction in our brain". Simply? what an absurd word to use! has Mr Quinn any idea how fantastically complex the human brain is? The electro-chemical processes of the brain are justly a source of wonder and joy for all those who study it.
Quinn is doing nothing more than parroting John Keats' old accusation that Isaac Newton somehow diminished the beauty of the rainbow by explaining it. In fact, the mysteries of the brain have provided inspiration for men of the calibre of Frances Crick - co discoverer of DNA, who writes about the complexity of the brain, consciousness and the scientific search for the soul in his book 'Astonishing Hypothesis'. I have no doubt that those who have read Crick's book (or indeed Dawkins' 'Unweaving the Rainbow') will agree that Quinn - and Keats - are sorely mistaken. For those fortunate enough to have some degree of understanding of what happens to a brain when it feels love, the experience is made all the more wonderful.
Mother Teresa's incredible good works are clearly far more important than her doubts about the existence of God. Perhaps this might provide an indicator to Mr Quinn that it is the here and now that deserves the focus of our thoughts; not vague notions of a supernatural being that even Mother Teresa seems never to have heard from.
Is Mise,
SJ



